All submissions to this conference will be reviewed by at least two independent reviewers selected from well-established researchers by the Programme Committee Chair. Manuscripts will be evaluated in terms of originality, research content, technical quality, conference relevance, academic contributions and readability. Final acceptance of full papers will be determined based on technical merit, research significance, practical applicability, and compatibility with a coherent and balanced technical program.
We will first check the plagiarism status of each submitted paper, with a strict rule that the similarity rate shall not exceed 15%. The conference takes all plagiarism cases very seriously, including self-plagiarism of the authors' previously published works. Papers with excessive plagiarism or self-plagiarism will be rejected directly. If any plagiarism misconduct is identified, the following sanction measures will be imposed:
1. Reject the submitted paper or remove it from the final conference publications.
2. Report the academic misconduct to the author's supervisors and affiliated institutions.
3. Notify the relevant academic ethics authorities and research funding agencies of the violation.
4. Reserve the right to disclose the plagiarist's name, paper title, affiliated institution, and detailed misconduct information.
5. Each paper shall clearly state its technical and scientific contributions, as well as the applicable research domains and practical scenarios. To comply with the double-blind review policy, authors must prepare and submit manuscripts without any author-identifying information, including personal details, acknowledgments, and any content that may reveal the authors' identities.